Real Life Simulation - Practice

Studiengang
  • International Program
Kennzahl der Lehrveranstaltung
  • IHSM-EU-HEM-E3.2
Anzahl der zugewiesenen ECTS-Credits
  • 5.0
Name des/der Vortragenden
  • FH-Prof. Dr. Kerschbaumer Lukas, Dr. Estèves Natacha, Wong An Qi Angela, BSc MA
Art der Veranstaltung
  • -
empfohlene optionale Programmeinheiten
  • Derzeit nur in Englisch verfügbar
    none
empfohlene Fachliteratur
  • Derzeit nur in Englisch verfügbar
    Evans, N., Duwe, M., Velten, E. (2023) Policy consistency: What it means, how to measure it, and links with other processes Considerations on the implementation of the EU Climate Law. Ecologic Institute (policy Brief). https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/default/files/publication/2023/50095-Policy-consistency-EUCL-implementation-web.pdf

    Coscieme, L., Mortensen, L, F., Donohue, I. (2021) Enhance environmental policy coherence to meet the Sustainable Development Goals, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 296.

    De Waal, I.M. (2021) Coherence in law: A way to stimulate the transition towards a circular economy? A critical analysis of the European Commission's aspiration to achieve full coherence between chemicals legislation and waste legislation - and product legislation. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2021, Vol. 28(6) 760-783.

    Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Miskon, S., Gorbacheva, E., & Beekhuyzen, J. (2015). Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 34(8), 154-204.

    Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., and Sutton, A. (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage.

    Briner, R. B., & Denyer, D. (2012). Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. In Rousseau, D. M. (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Evidenence Based Management. (S. 112-129). Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 [Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen] .

    Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford:Blackwell. Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide. 2nd edn. London: Sage.

    Creswell, J. W. (2005). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE.

    Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-10.

    Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Niveau der Lehrveranstaltung laut Lehrplan
  • Bachelor
Studienjahr
  • Fall 2025
Semester in dem die Lehrveranstaltung angeboten wird
  • 3
Unterrichtssprache
  • English
Lernergebnisse der Lehrveranstaltung
  • Derzeit nur in Englisch verfügbar
    The goal of the course is two-pronged. It aims to:

    - equip students with fundamental skills, knowledge, tools of system thinking in (health and social) research and policy areas
    - hone career readiness competencies such as critical thinking, communication teamwork, ethical and professional integrity, leadership, thinking skills (problem solving and decision making), and practice/actualise various aspects of project management.
Lehrinhalte
  • Derzeit nur in Englisch verfügbar
    Students work with coaches on provided background material at real life solutions for the problem presented in the RLS Methods

    Students understand how to plan and execute a project that has to align to academic standards and to practitioners’ expectations.

    Students are able to consider and apply quality and evaluation criteria in the planning of their projects.

    Students are familiar with selected tools to plan, implement, and evaluate projects and programs as well as to continuously adapt them to the local context.

    Students know how to manage the expectations of real life managers.

    Students will apply political economy analysis tools enabling them to tailor projects to specific contexts.

    Students will apply a stakeholder analysis as a basis for projects and its large-scale implementation in health systems.

    Students will understand the principles of behavioral economics and its possible applications to promote health.
Lehr- und Lernformen
  • Derzeit nur in Englisch verfügbar
    The course comprises an interactive mix of lectures, discussions and individual and group work.
Praktikum
  • none

Das MCI verwendet Cookies, um Inhalte und Empfehlungen auf Ihre Interessen auszurichten. Detailinformationen über den Einsatz von Cookies und Services für Zwecke der Webanalyse und des Online-Marketings finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Wenn Sie unsere Website weiterhin nutzen, stimmen Sie der Cookie-Nutzung zu.