Analysis & Epidemiology

Department
  • Master's Program International Health & Social Management
Course unit code
  • IHSM-EU-HEM-M2.4
Number of ECTS credits allocated
  • 5.0
Name of lecturer(s)
  • Dr. Mosenhauer Natacha, Priv. Doz. Dr. med. Borena Wegene, FH-Prof. Dr. Walch Siegfried, Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gondan-Rochon Matthias
Mode of delivery
  • -
Recommended optional program components
  • none
Recommended or required reading
  • Liu, C., Hu, B., Wang, Y., Pang, X., Guo, K., & Zhu, X. (2025). Enhancing social participation in older adults with noncommunicable diseases: Insights from system dynamics modeling. BMC Public Health, 26, Article 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25741-2

    World Health Organization. (2009). Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization, download: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/885c4703-060b-463e-ae06-a0fdc02dbd4e/content

    CHMP (2010) Guideline on Missing Data in Confirmatory Clinical Trials
    Wolbers M, Noci A, Delmar P, Gower-Page C, Yiu S, Bartlett JW. Standard and reference-based conditional mean imputation. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2022;21(6):1246-1257. doi:10.1002/pst.2234

    World Health Organization. (2022). Systems thinking for noncommunicable disease prevention policy: Guidance and case studies. Geneva: World Health Organization, download: https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/WHO-EURO-2022-4195-43954-61946

    CHMP (2015). Guideline on Adjustment for Baseline Covariates in Clinical Trials. London: European Medicines Agency.
    Kabisch, M. (2011). Randomized controlled trials. Dtsch Ärztebl Int, 108, 663-668.
    Röhrig, B. (2010). Sample size calculation. Dtsch Ärztebl Int, 107, 552-556.

    CHMP (2019). Guideline on the Investigation of Subgroups in Confirmatory Clinical Trials. London: European Medicines Agency.
    CHMP (2016). Guideline on Multiplicity Issues in Clinical Trials. London: European Medicines Agency.
    Coxe, S. (2009). The analysis of count data. J Personality Assess, 91, 121-136.
    Park, H. A. (2013). An introduction to logistic regression. J Kor Acad Nurs, 43, 154-164.

    Hammer, G. P. (2009). Avoiding bias in observational studies. Dtsch Ärztebl Int, 106, 664-668.
    Kuss, O. (2016). Propensity scores. Dtsch Ärztebl Int, 113, 597-603.
    Ressning, M. et al. (2010). Data analysis of epidemiological studies. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 107, 187-192.
    Röhrig, B. et al. (2009). Types of study in medical research. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 106, 262-268.

    Greenland et al. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology, 199, 37-48.
    Krieger, N. & Smith, G. D. (2016). The tale wagged by the DAG: broadening the scope of causal inference and explanation for epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1787-1808.
Additional information about examination modalities
  • Course-immanent examination or final exam or combination of both examination types.
Level of course unit
  • Master
Year of study
  • Spring 2026
Semester when the course unit is delivered
  • 2
Language of instruction
  • English
Learning outcomes of the course unit
  • By the end of this course, students will be able to:

    -demonstrate a solid understanding of the role of epidemiology and its contribution to public health and evidence-informed decision-making
    -understand key concepts, definitions, and applications of epidemiology and population health analysis
    -explain how health outcomes emerge from complex interactions between biological, behavioral, social, and policy-related factors
    -apply systems thinking approaches to analyze complex public health problems and visualize interdependencies (e.g., through causal models)
    -differentiate between common disease classification schemes and patterns of disease occurrence at the population level
    -critically assess public health surveillance systems, indicators, and risk measures
    -understand core epidemiological study designs and principles of causal inference
    -interpret epidemiological data and evaluate the strengths and limitations of empirical evidence
    -reflect on how epidemiological evidence can be used to test hypotheses derived from conceptual or system-based models
    critically question risk appraisals and public health interventions in light of complexity and real-world dynamics
Course contents
  • This course provides an integrated introduction to the analytical foundations of modern public health by combining systems thinking, epidemiology, and quantitative methods. It emphasizes how these perspectives jointly contribute to understanding complex health problems and informing evidence-based decision-making.
Planned learning activities and teaching methods
  • The course comprises an interactive mix of lectures, discussions and individual and group work.
Work placement(s)
  • none

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.